The Gist Of Animal Testing Persuasive Essays.
Animal Testing Should be banned” Imagine having a hole drilled in your head without any anesthesia. Imagine being kept in eternal darkness your whole life because one or both eyes were sewn shut or even removed for no good reason. How about being clamped down to a table with shock-producing electrodes attached to your genitals. Laboratory animals are put through these horrors every day.
It is one thing using the animal to test new medicine, but for cosmetics it is completely unnecessary Animal testing is avoidable in most cases as there are many other ways of testing cosmetics and even new medicines that usually take less time than the crude and archaic tests that are carried out on the animals. Also recent research has shown that the results of these tests are rarely.
Animal Testing Argumentative Essay. Abstract. Animal testing which is also referred to as animal experimentation is the process whereby non-human living things are used in scientific labs to carry out various experiments. These experiments involves carrying out diverse tests on the animals to come up with an idea of how effective or dangerous a.
Animal rights advocates argue that animal testing is not only cruel and unnecessary but also finds similarity with racism or sexism. These advocates believe that not only humans but also these animals deserve respect and should not suffer for reasons that are morally and ethically wrong. All suffering is undesirable, whether it be in humans or animals. Discriminating against animals because.
Argumentative Essay: The Cons of Animal Testing There is a lot of conflict on the subject of animal testing. Many believe animals shouldn’t have to be put through something so inhumane while other believe testing on animals is vital to finding cures for deadly diseases. Animals are being exploited by research facilities all around the world. Although humans often benefit from successful.
Animal testing is regarded as unkind treatment towards animals as it violates animal rights as their lives are valuable as well (Le Fanu, 2003). Nevertheless, their arguments are weak because animals lack the sense of judgment, and therefore are not subjected to moral claims and animal rights (Cohen, 1986). Hence, they cannot be compared with human life. As long as the animal is experimented.
While some contest the use of animals for animal testing it is not a new idea. Research tests conducted on living animals have been practiced since 500 BC. Nonetheless there are those who argue that the use of animals for testing is an inhumane and cruel practice. They argue that alternative methods should be developed to prohibit the need for animal testing. Many organizations such as PETA.